<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rdf:RDF xml:base="http://softwaremanagers.org/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
 <channel rdf:about="http://softwaremanagers.org/taxonomy/term/33/0">
  <title>SoftwareManagers.org - software enforcement industry</title>
  <link>http://softwaremanagers.org/taxonomy/term/33/0</link>
  <description></description>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <items>
   <rdf:Seq>
    <rdf:li resource="http://softwaremanagers.org/node/186" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://softwaremanagers.org/node/179" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://softwaremanagers.org/node/99" />
   </rdf:Seq>
  </items>
 </channel>
 <item rdf:about="http://softwaremanagers.org/node/186">
  <title>Ever Climbing Whistle Blower Rewards and Settlements</title>
  <link>http://softwaremanagers.org/node/186</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;The reward for reporting software piracy to the BSA is "up to $1 Million".  How much does the person reporting the piracy receive?  Not the full amount.  Not much at all.  Is the person reporting a company for piracy really protected by whistle blower law?  Not always. One employee was &lt;a href="http://www.careers.eweek.com/article/Suit+Employee+Fired+for+Reporting+Breach/215630_1.aspx?kc=EWKNLCSM092507STR1"&gt;fired&lt;/a&gt; for reporting a security breach.&lt;br /&gt;
The BSA is only one of the 26 enforcement agencies in the United States.  There are over 100 in the world.  2008 is off to a good start. It's only February and the BSA has announced collecting the following settlements: $72,053, $80,000, $92,500, $175,000, $135,750, $112,000.  Remember, the actual costs involved in a settlement run three to six times the settlement figures shown.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <dc:date>2008-03-04T01:48:12Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>software enforcement industry</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://softwaremanagers.org/node/179">
  <title>NEW!  BTCN Online Training Preview</title>
  <link>http://softwaremanagers.org/node/179</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, "...the great majority of businesses out here in the "real world" still haven't recognized the massive threat represented by the software piracy and copyright enforcement industry players." --Alan Plastow&lt;br /&gt;
Of particular interest on the updated Business Technology Consumer Network (BTCN) website is a video presentation that all your management must watch.  This compelling, eye-opening video gives you the flavor of the only &lt;strong&gt;online&lt;/strong&gt; course on software pirate audit offense that also leads to 25% software savings.  There are facts and figures you won't forget.  Take a few moments to watch &lt;a href=" http://www.samsrv.com/The%20Network/Introduction_to_Conducting_the_Defensive_Software_Piracy_Audit_Sound.swf"&gt; Software Piracy Prevention Training Overviews&lt;/a&gt;.  Share it with your management.  It doesn't get more convenient, cost effective and time efficient than this!&lt;br /&gt;
The BTCN also offers some nice &lt;a href="http://www.biztechnet.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;#038;task=blogcategory&amp;#038;id=48&amp;#038;Itemid=163 "&gt;Project Management&lt;/a&gt; courses.  Take a look!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <dc:date>2007-09-28T03:50:21Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>software enforcement industry</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://softwaremanagers.org/node/99">
  <title>Standardized Software File Headers</title>
  <link>http://softwaremanagers.org/node/99</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;One thing I would like to see happen, now that software consumers are getting more proactive and aware, is somehow to find a way to encourage software publishers to set a standard as far as software headers go to aid in license compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
It seems it is very difficult for publishers of software asset management software to get everything right when they scan for software as the headers are all unique to the publisher.&lt;br /&gt;
Not only that, but they can be unique to each product, and version of the product, by the publisher.&lt;br /&gt;
If it is so difficult for the publishers of software asset management software, how hard is it for us to deal with the complexities of managing software licensing?&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to see the publishers take it upon themselves to standarize the headers in their packages, but I don't think that will happen. I really believe it will be organizations such as the Software Managers Resource and other consumer organizations who will need to address this issue and present it to the software publishers.&lt;br /&gt;
Now, how can we, as very informed and involved consumers, and I.T. Asset mangers, go about addressing this issue? I have ideas, but the logistics of doing it are enormous. I'd be interested in knowing what others think of this proposal.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <dc:date>2005-06-05T05:16:23Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>software enforcement industry</dc:subject>
 </item>
</rdf:RDF>
