Skip navigation.
Home

Software Licensing in an Uproar

licensing

Some software publishers are scrambling to increase revenues and create a steady revenue stream to keep afloat by introducing new licensing schemes that lead to greater complexity and confusion. A good trend overview can be found in the PDF report by the SIIA, Key Trends in Software Licensing.

Another survey conducted by Macrovision of nearly 400 software companies and 100 enterprise executives responsible for software purchases from October, 2004 mentioned in this C|Net article Customers cool on subscription software says ...the study found that corporate customers aren't yet buying into the change. Sixty-four percent of software buyers prefer buying a license up-front over a subscription model...

These articles discuss other license plans that add complexity to the already complex field of software management. In a NetworkWorld article from July 2004 Linda Musthaler wrote that

While customers clamor for software licensing simplicity, the vast array of choices will make your head swim. It looks like it's time to get certified in software license management.

The process of figuring out what kinds of licenses are best for your organization, and tracking them, gets more complicated every day. The whole IT industry is ready for a shake up in the way that customers pay for software use. And for once, customers are driving this paradigm shift.

Douglas Chick states in his article about the Macrovision survey that IT people [are] tired of being pushed around by software vendors. He sees that Subscription-based Licenses are Pushing IT Closer to Open Source.

One thing I would like to see

One thing I would like to see happen, now that software consumers are getting more proactive, is somehow to find a way to encourage software publishers to set a standard as far as software headers go to aid in license compliance.

It seems it is very difficult for publishers of software asset management software to get everything right when they scan for software as the headers are all unique to the publisher.

Not only that, they can be unique to each product, and version of the product, by the publisher.

If it is so difficult for the publishers of software asset management software, how hard is it for us to deal with the complexities of managing software licensing?

I would like to see the publishers take it upon themselves to standarize the headers in their packages, but I don't think that will happen. I really believe it will be organizations such as the Software managers Resource and the International Association of I.T. Asset Managers who will need to address this issue and present it to the software publishers.

Now, how can we, as very informed and involved consumers, and I.T. Asset mangers, go about addressing this issue? I have ideas, but the logistics of doing it are enormous. I'd be interested in knowing what others think of this proposal.

Thomas A. Wills, CSM, CITAM
Information Systems Manager, Software Compliance
Tucson, AZ

Standard headers to aid softw

Standard headers to aid software management is a good subject for a blog entry for more visibility and invitation for comment. Your comment could be copied and pasted to create a new blog entry.

--
-- Rita Bowman

http://softwaremanagers.org/n